Ordinary buyers are accustomed to evaluate monitors mainly by the size of the diagonal in inches. But the development of the market for these devices, the development and application of various, modern and promising technologies in the manufacture of screens changed the situation. The quality and parameters of the matrix, the method of its production also became important criteria in choosing a device. Each of the existing options has its advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between them depends on the preferences of the user, on the tasks that confront him.
The right choice of monitor determines the further convenience of interacting with it, which is important in study, work and even entertainment. An incorrectly selected screen threatens with irritation, displeasure from the work process, and even health problems. Therefore, before going to the salon, you need to decide what is actually worth buying. To do this, you need to understand how the matrices in monitors differ and what types exist.
What are the matrices for monitors
There are several technologies that make the matrix of monitors. Some of them have been used on the market for a long time, some new, modern and accordingly advanced. Well, given the difference in both technical specifications and price, you should carefully study the offer before making a purchase decision.
The most common are the followers of the TNT TN, MVA, IPS, TFT PLS, OLED models, their combinations, as well as less popular electronic products. Each of these devices is targeted at a specific category of customers.
Model TFT TN)
TFT TN appeared on the market for a long time and is still popular, but already in the form of more advanced modifications. The horizontal viewing angle of the TNT TN + film variant can reach 130-150 °, the vertical angle remains the same. The brightness is also not impressive. It is unlikely that such a device will be useful to a designer or photographer.
REFERENCE! But the device also has undeniable advantages, including the minimum response time, which is below 1 ms. Due to this indicator, the monitor remains in demand even though its cost exceeds five hundred dollars.
TFT IPS Model
This matrix, which originally won a place under the sun in the design of mobile phones, has a good viewing angle. Clearly better. than the first model, since the differences are quite significant. In practice, this is 180 °, both horizontally and vertically. Good color gamut is also not superfluous, especially when it reaches 100% sRGB.
Of the minuses of the model, too low contrast should be noted. 1000: 1 is not an indicator that you may like. It is he who distorts the display of black light and is the cause of a number of undesirable effects. The response time leaves much to be desired - up to 6 ms, which allows, nevertheless, to count on 100-150 frames, which can be safely displayed on the screen.
There are many subspecies of monitors whose matrix is made using this technology, but the difference between them is not too big.
Model TFT * VA
The device by the basic parameters can be attributed to the average between previous models. The matrix is characterized by high contrast, good viewing angles vertically and horizontally. A significant response time becomes the reason that gamers bypass such a product.
There are also quite a few subspecies of the model, each of which has its own specific advantages.
Model TFT PLS
This matrix is somewhere similar to IPS, and so much so that it is difficult to distinguish them without special studies. But you can look at the price tag and understand what is happening and why. The device, in fact, is a cheaper option for IPS, designed for the corresponding segment of customers.
OLED Model
Matrixes built on an LED base are considered the most promising. There are enough reasons for this, including the lack of black brightness, response time not even in milliseconds, viewing angles almost reaching 180 °. When the monitor deviates, the brightness remains stable. And also a high color gamut.
Of the disadvantages - flicker at certain frequencies, causing eye fatigue, and fragility, combined with a fairly high price.
Which is the best?
It is impossible to unequivocally answer the question which matrix for the monitor is the best. Here, individual approaches dominate. But many experts believe that there is no equal to the Ips / Oled combination, in the manufacture of which the so-called organic LEDs are used.
Matrix for working with photos and videos
Graphic designers, prepress specialists, and other users who work with complex graphics will prefer IPS matrices. The most important characteristics for them are contrast, color quality and color accuracy.
For video editing, many prefer LED monitors. And it’s absolutely contraindicated for the photo, for the TN matrix video.
Matrix for games
Gamers, as you would expect, prefer devices with a minimal response, without gaps or jams. For ordinary gamers, the design response should be 3-5 ms. For professional e-sportsmen, this indicator should reach 1 ms, or even less. Typically, fans of computer games choose matrices made using IPS and OLED technology. An excellent alternative for them are VA-matrices. Generally speaking, there is no single approach here. It all depends on the characteristics of a particular monitor model, on the preferences and financial capabilities of each user.
IMPORTANT! Experienced gamers also note such a feature as the mismatch of the reality of the declared matrix indicators. In many cases, the response time is much higher, and other parameters do not correspond to the passport data.
In general, monitors with special characteristics are developed specifically for this category, and developers choose almost all types of matrices, except perhaps the oldest ones. And then, the response time of a pixel in a device manufactured using TN technology attracts many, therefore, gaming monitors also do with this matrix. It is believed that it is well suited for dynamic games, since the loop that appears when braking does not occur.
Leave Your Comment